Numerous projects in the compensation environment (national / international) (Compensation & Benefits)

in the role of Project Manager

Company:
MEAG MUNICH ERGO AssetManagement GmbH

www.meag.com

Branch:

  • Financial Services
  • Bank
  • Insurance
  • Asset Management

Turnover:
300 Mio €

Number of employees:
850 employees

Company headquarters:
Munich

Area of responsibility (budget / employees):

  • Budget: upon request
  • Different areas of responsibility
  • 1-5 employees

Measures:

National remuneration projects

  • 2021: Redesign of the company pension plan
    (Target group: Senior executives and AT employees)
  • 2019: Transfer of remuneration and company pension schemes of employees from different group companies
    (Target group: Senior executives and AT employees)
  • 2016-2017 / 2011: Changeover of variable compensation system, esp. taking into account national and international regulatory requirements (EIOPA, ESMA guidelines, BaFin) as well as group requirements; establishment of various compensation committees; preparation of compensation reports on compliance progress
    (Target group: management, risk-takers and senior executives)
  • 2014: Conversion of the company pension plan from defined benefits (DB) to defined contribution (DC).
    (Target group: Management)
  • 2009: Standardization of the collective agreements applied
  • 2006: Introduction of a new function evaluation and compensation system
    (Target group: Senior executives and AT employees)

International compensation projects

  • 2019-2020: Review of compensation structures and levels in the New York asset management unit, including derivation of actions.
    (Target group: Management and employees (USA))
  • 2016-2017: Introduction of written contracts, conversion of variable compensation system (focus: multi-year bonuses)
    (Target group: Management USA / Hong Kong)

Successes:

  • Compliance of compensation structures with regulatory requirements
  • Alignment of group-wide and cross-hierarchy compensation structures
  • Establishment of long-term incentives
  • Performance orientation of compensation structures
  • Affordability, protection and/or attractiveness of fringe benefits.

Special challenges:

  • Common resistance to transitioning established compensation/retirement systems to new systems/structures

Share on the network

Scroll to Top